Tensions flared on Fox News’ The Five after co-host Greg Gutfeld forcefully rejected Jessica Tarlov’s attempt to frame political violence as a “both sides” issue in the wake of the ass@ssination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.
Kirk, 31, was sh0t and k!lled Wednesday while speaking at Utah Valley University. Authorities arrested Tyler Robinson, 28, of Provo, Utah, who confessed to the k!lling and faces multiple charges, including first-degree m::urder.
On The Five, Gutfeld opened by noting a one-sided trend. “What is interesting here is, why is only this happening on the left and not the right? That’s all we need to know,” he said.
Tarlov interjected, pointing to other recent incidents of political violence, including the k!lling of Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and other attacks that have targeted Democrats.
“Yeah, so what about Vance Boelter? What about Melissa Hortman that we just talked about?” she asked.
Gutfeld immediately cut her off, raising his voice. “None of us were spending every single day talking about Mrs. Hortman. I never heard of her until after she di3d. And the… Don’t play that bulls—t with me. There was no demonization, amplification about that woman before she di3d. It was a specific crime against her by somebody who knew her.”
Advertisement
The back-and-forth escalated as Gutfeld rejected the premise of equivalence between Kirk’s ass@ssination and other k!llings. “The both sides argument not only doesn’t fly, we don’t care. We don’t care about your both sides argument. That s—t is d3ad,” he said.
He framed the dispute as one between reality and rationalization. “On your side, your beliefs do not match reality, so you’re coming up with these rationalizations, like, ‘What about this,’ or, ‘What about that?’ We’re not doing that, because we saw it happen. We saw a young, bright man ass@ssinated and we know who did it. We are not coming up with rationalizations. We are calm, we are honest, and we are resolute. We’re not defensive.”
Gutfeld argued that left-wing rhetoric had created the conditions for violence. “If you sat around and you defended the mutilation of children, you’re not the good guys. If you sat 600, 700 cases of harassment against Republicans and you said, ‘But what about this? What about this?’ And then you see this m::urderer after calling somebody a fascist, you realize, ‘Maybe I’m not the good guy.’”
He added that Kirk’s ass@ssin, Robinson, had been influenced by what he called “direct-to-consumer nihilism” and radical ideologies. “He was a patsy. He was under the hypnotic spell of a direct-to-consumer nihilism, the trans cult,” Gutfeld said. “If you can decide that biology is false, you can agree that m::urder is okay and that humanity’s expendable.”
Tarlov attempted to clarify that she was not minimizing Kirk’s death, but Gutfeld continued pressing his point.
“The two sides argument… it’s like pig Latin to a duck. Charlie had a conversation and he got sht. This thing is with us for good. And we all have to deal with that. So that means we can’t live by the same arguments that you might be reading about, about relativism among the media. It doesn’t matter. The media’s d3ad to us on this story. They built this thing up. We’re dealing with it. We’re gonna act. We don’t care what the what-about-ism is anymore. That s—t’s d3ad.”
