The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has declassified a 2015 intelligence report revealing that then-Vice President Joe Biden requested the agency not to disseminate a document detailing Ukrainian officials’ concerns about his family’s alleged corrupt business dealings in Ukraine.

The report, dated December 2015 and created in 2016, captured Ukrainian officials’ frustration over Biden’s visit to Kyiv, where they expected discussions on personnel matters but received only a generic public speech.

Following the visit, some Ukrainian officials privately expressed concerns that the U.S. Vice President’s family had ties to corruption in Ukraine, viewing it as evidence of a double standard within the U.S. government regarding corruption and political power.

CIA Director John Ratcliffe declassified the heavily redacted records, stating that this was an example of “politicization of intelligence.” A senior CIA official confirmed that Biden’s request was granted, and the intelligence report was not disseminated outside the CIA.

The official noted that it was “extremely rare and unusual” for the White House to inquire about the dissemination of a particular report for what appeared to be political reasons.

The declassified documents have reignited scrutiny over Biden’s actions as Vice President and raised questions about the extent to which political considerations influenced intelligence operations during that period.

Republican lawmakers have seized upon the declassified documents, alleging that Biden’s aides suppressed information about his family’s business ties in Ukraine to protect his political interests.

James Comer, a Republican lawmaker, claimed that the newly declassified CIA documents back GOP allegations of suppression of Biden family business ties in Ukraine.

This revelation adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that intelligence agencies may have been used to shield the Biden family from scrutiny during the Obama administration.

The full implications of this declassified document remain to be seen, but it underscores the ongoing scrutiny of the Biden family’s foreign business dealings and the role of intelligence agencies in addressing potential conflicts of interest.

The declassification of this report has prompted calls for further investigation into the actions of the Biden administration and its handling of intelligence information.

Critics argue that the suppression of such information undermines public trust in government institutions and raises concerns about accountability and transparency.

The debate over the declassification of this report highlights the broader issue of executive power and the balance between transparency and oversight.

It raises important questions about the role of intelligence agencies in informing public discourse and the extent to which political considerations should influence the dissemination of sensitive information.

As the controversy continues to unfold, lawmakers and the public await further developments and potential investigations into the actions of the Biden administration and its handling of intelligence information related to Ukraine.

The declassification of this report serves as a reminder of the complex and often contentious relationship between politics and intelligence, and the challenges inherent in ensuring that sensitive information is handled appropriately and in the public interest.

In the coming weeks, it is expected that congressional committees will hold hearings to examine the circumstances surrounding the suppression of this intelligence report and to assess the implications for U.S. foreign policy and national security.

The outcome of these investigations could have significant ramifications for the Biden administration and its legacy, as well as for public trust in government institutions and the integrity of the intelligence community.

As the story develops, it will be important to monitor the responses of key stakeholders, including lawmakers and intelligence officials, to gauge the broader impact of this declassification on U.S. politics and governance.

The declassification of this report also underscores the importance of oversight and accountability in the intelligence community, and the need for mechanisms to ensure that sensitive information is handled responsibly and in accordance with the law.

Moving forward, it will be crucial to assess the lessons learned from this episode and to consider reforms that can strengthen the integrity and transparency of intelligence operations.

This declassification brings to light the urgent need for reform in how intelligence is protected from political interference.

Lawmakers are expected to demand greater transparency and safeguards to prevent future suppression of critical intelligence for political purposes.

The revelations further confirm concerns about the politicization of intelligence agencies during the Obama-Biden era.

Republicans and conservative commentators argue that this episode demonstrates a clear abuse of executive authority to shield political allies.

The CIA documents highlight how the suppression of intelligence can undermine national security and the credibility of U.S. foreign policy.

The declassified report has reinvigorated calls for accountability and thorough investigations into the Biden family’s dealings abroad.

BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED…

Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.

 

Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.

She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.

“Even if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,” Luna told Fox News. “We have been more than patient.”

These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein’s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.

Luna’s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.

The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ’s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.

“The Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,” Luna said. “This is corruption at the highest level.”

Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. “Had this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,” one conservative commentator noted.

For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America’s elite circles. The financier’s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.

Now, Luna’s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.

What’s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals—politicians, celebrities, and global financiers—who participated in or enabled Epstein’s crimes.

In this context, Luna’s SHRED Act isn’t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.

Despite Luna’s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.

Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ’s handling of Epstein evidence.

Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.

This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.

Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ’s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.

The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna’s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.

BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For…

 

Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.

Speaking from his post as one of President Trump’s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.

“This is a live federal investigation. We’ve asked ICE to take immediate action,” Homan said during a televised interview.

The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC’s office.

According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.

Homan stressed that AOC’s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.

“This goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There’s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,” he stated.

Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.

AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as “racist” and “oppressors.”

 

Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.

“If a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that’s a clear violation of federal law,” Homan declared.

Sources inside ICE say agents have already gathered documentation and begun interviewing individuals connected to the case.

Evidence suggests AOC may have leveraged her political power to block enforcement action against the individual she employed.

House Republicans are demanding accountability, with several calling for a formal ethics investigation into her conduct.

“This is what happens when radicals gain power. They think the law doesn’t apply to them,” said Rep. Andy Biggs.

Democrats quickly circled the wagons, accusing Homan of launching a political smear campaign.

But Homan stood firm, reminding the public that the law is the law and political office offers no immunity from prosecution.

“This isn’t about politics. It’s about national security and public trust,” he said.

Homan emphasized that ICE agents are working independently and that the White House is not interfering in the investigation.

“We are following the facts. If those facts point to criminal activity, then action will be taken,” Homan confirmed.

Legal experts say AOC could face charges ranging from unlawful employment to obstruction of federal agents, depending on the evidence.

Citizens outraged by the news are demanding swift justice and a full public accounting of the congresswoman’s actions.

Homan urged Americans not to let political ideology blind them to the seriousness of the allegations.

“We must restore the rule of law,” he concluded. “No one, no matter how powerful, is above it.”

BREAKING: The FBI Launches Criminal Investigation Into..

It’s finally happening.

John Brennan and James Comey—two of the most powerful Obama-era intelligence chiefs—are now facing criminal investigations.

Their role in pushing the fabricated Trump-Russia collusion narrative derailed a presidency and deceived the nation.

 

Sources inside the Justice Department confirm that former CIA Director Brennan is under investigation for allegedly lying to Congress.

Ex-FBI Director Comey is also the subject of an ongoing probe.

Their roles in the origin and manipulation of the Trump-Russia hoax are being scrutinized, years after millions of Americans demanded accountability.

Brennan is accused of pushing the phony Steele dossier into official intelligence assessments.

CIA Russia experts warned the document was so flawed it didn’t meet even “the most basic tradecraft standards.”

“Jasmine Crockett didn’t just insult Trump,” Leavitt said during her White House briefing. “She smeared over 70 million Americans who believe in freedom, God, secure borders, and the Constitution. Calling them mentally ill is not just false—it’s dangerous.”

 

Brennan ignored the warnings and formalized his demand in writing, insisting the fake dossier be included anyway.

James Comey, for his part, did the same.

The CIA’s review makes clear: FBI leadership under Comey pressured the intelligence community to embed the Steele dossier in their final report on Russian election interference.

The FBI “repeatedly pushed” for its inclusion.